I haven't submitted to The Virginia Quarterly Review, but you'd never know it from looking at their ten most common titles of submissions. (via) I know for a fact that I have a story with title #2 somewhere. The only reason I haven't used #3 is because it is the title of one of my favorite Flannery O'Connor stories. #6,7 and 10 are right up my alley, though #8 and 9 are a little too flashy for my tastes.
All of that said, even before I read this? I've been trying to put myself through Title Rehab. It's kinda dumb to have stories whose titles you hate, like giving your child some name you can't stand. When I went back and thought about it, the pieces I've written that I've really liked over the years have one thing in common: the titles don't suck. One of them even has some function.
So I've been writing down titles that I like. Both real and as yet unused. Most important, completely independent of the stories to which they may belong. My criteria is this: If someone asked me what I was writing, I'd want to respond by saying "I'm working on a story called..." Real titles that pass this test: Slaughterhouse-Five, The Franchiser, Why I Live at the P.O., The End of the Affair, Harriet the Spy. Titles that do not: Survivor, Unstuck, Feed, everything on that VQR list. See some trends there? Yeah, me too.
This is still all new to me, though...so I suspect I'm going to go through pubescent phases where I try out title styles. Like this one thing I've got, formerly called Promotion. It's now Dennis Explains the Stash, which a few days later sounds to me like a combination of Nickelodeon/Disney programming and a demented Beverly Cleary book. That may not necessarily be a bad thing, though. It's better than Promotion, therefore in accordance with what are apparently my personal tastes, which is a start.
Recent Comments